<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Journeymouse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journeymouse.net/wp/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journeymouse.net/wp</link>
	<description>Just another mouse in a man&#039;s world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:22:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Building Blocks by Dylan Fox</title>
		<link>http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1186#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1186#comment-884</guid>
		<description>&quot;(This is a trick question. Everyone knows that true heroes, being well-off / members of the nobility / so gosh-darn kick-ass, ride everywhere.)&quot;

Objection!  In Lord of the Rings, the characters &lt;i&gt;quested&lt;/i&gt;, and I think in Journey to the West, they &#039;journeyed on foot&#039;.  Both expressions implying very long and difficult walks, more than a trek or a hike.  I mean, saying Frodo and Sam hiked to Mordor brings to mind some kind of coming-of-age, jolly walk through picturesque mountains and the biggest obstacle being that time when it was pouring rain and they couldn&#039;t get the tent up.  Even &#039;trek&#039; doesn&#039;t sound long enough.  Although it&#039;s interesting the extent to which context can modify meaning.  I&#039;m pretty sure no one, for example, imaged Star Trek taking place on foot.  &#039;Star&#039; sets the trek in space and so a space ship becomes necessary.

&quot;If only because a writer needs to be sure that these really are the right words to get across that idea.&quot;

I sometimes wonder if people working in other languages have quite the choice that those of us working in English do.  Nearly all our words have a dozen different synonyms that aren&#039;t quite synonyms (illustrated perfectly by your &#039;walking&#039; example, to which I could add promenade, parade, shuffle, wander and scootch just off the top of my head).  The British Isle have been invaded and invaded so many different times by so many different people, our language is a wonderful hodge-podge with every hodge overlapping a dozen different podges.  

As far as I know, Welsh doesn&#039;t have anything like the linguistic variety English does, and certainly not among native speakers.  At lot of native speakers I know will slip into English every few sentences.  I wonder how many other languages have the same degree of variety and word choice as English does.

Interesting stuff, though!  And you don&#039;t even get into how the same word can mean different things in different contexts or with different groups of people, even though the dictionary definition doesn&#039;t change.  Or even in different circumstances.  &#039;Small&#039; might mean four foot when talking about a person, or sixty foot when talking about an office block.

I find words incredibly useful as building blocks for thoughts.  If I want to organise my thoughts, I need to sit down with a pen and paper and actually write everything out.  Until it&#039;s on a piece of paper, it&#039;s just a diffuse thing that can slip away.  When it&#039;s written, it&#039;s been defined and so is easier to exam and manipulate.  This is why my first drafts tend to be alternately long and rambling and barely sketched out.

And lastly, there&#039;s a very interesting article about linguistic relativity  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/magazine/29language-t.html?pagewanted=all&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;(This is a trick question. Everyone knows that true heroes, being well-off / members of the nobility / so gosh-darn kick-ass, ride everywhere.)&#8221;</p>
<p>Objection!  In Lord of the Rings, the characters <i>quested</i>, and I think in Journey to the West, they &#8216;journeyed on foot&#8217;.  Both expressions implying very long and difficult walks, more than a trek or a hike.  I mean, saying Frodo and Sam hiked to Mordor brings to mind some kind of coming-of-age, jolly walk through picturesque mountains and the biggest obstacle being that time when it was pouring rain and they couldn&#8217;t get the tent up.  Even &#8216;trek&#8217; doesn&#8217;t sound long enough.  Although it&#8217;s interesting the extent to which context can modify meaning.  I&#8217;m pretty sure no one, for example, imaged Star Trek taking place on foot.  &#8216;Star&#8217; sets the trek in space and so a space ship becomes necessary.</p>
<p>&#8220;If only because a writer needs to be sure that these really are the right words to get across that idea.&#8221;</p>
<p>I sometimes wonder if people working in other languages have quite the choice that those of us working in English do.  Nearly all our words have a dozen different synonyms that aren&#8217;t quite synonyms (illustrated perfectly by your &#8216;walking&#8217; example, to which I could add promenade, parade, shuffle, wander and scootch just off the top of my head).  The British Isle have been invaded and invaded so many different times by so many different people, our language is a wonderful hodge-podge with every hodge overlapping a dozen different podges.  </p>
<p>As far as I know, Welsh doesn&#8217;t have anything like the linguistic variety English does, and certainly not among native speakers.  At lot of native speakers I know will slip into English every few sentences.  I wonder how many other languages have the same degree of variety and word choice as English does.</p>
<p>Interesting stuff, though!  And you don&#8217;t even get into how the same word can mean different things in different contexts or with different groups of people, even though the dictionary definition doesn&#8217;t change.  Or even in different circumstances.  &#8216;Small&#8217; might mean four foot when talking about a person, or sixty foot when talking about an office block.</p>
<p>I find words incredibly useful as building blocks for thoughts.  If I want to organise my thoughts, I need to sit down with a pen and paper and actually write everything out.  Until it&#8217;s on a piece of paper, it&#8217;s just a diffuse thing that can slip away.  When it&#8217;s written, it&#8217;s been defined and so is easier to exam and manipulate.  This is why my first drafts tend to be alternately long and rambling and barely sketched out.</p>
<p>And lastly, there&#8217;s a very interesting article about linguistic relativity  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/magazine/29language-t.html?pagewanted=all" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sunday 29th April, 2012 by Journeymouse</title>
		<link>http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1178#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>Journeymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1178#comment-865</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t need to teach her to recognise pink - just to play with her collar and lead when she&#039;s teething :)

Hellhound Snr and the princess haven&#039;t met yet. FInn has been enjoying sniffing my clothes when I come back from Sam&#039;s and we&#039;re going to start exchanging blankets so that they can get used to each other&#039;s scent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t need to teach her to recognise pink &#8211; just to play with her collar and lead when she&#8217;s teething <img src='http://journeymouse.net/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Hellhound Snr and the princess haven&#8217;t met yet. FInn has been enjoying sniffing my clothes when I come back from Sam&#8217;s and we&#8217;re going to start exchanging blankets so that they can get used to each other&#8217;s scent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sunday 29th April, 2012 by Dylan Fox</title>
		<link>http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1178#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1178#comment-864</guid>
		<description>I would say you could train her to attack pink, but I don&#039;t think dogs can recognise it...

She looks so comfortable in that photo!  How&#039;s Hellhound Snr. taking to her?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say you could train her to attack pink, but I don&#8217;t think dogs can recognise it&#8230;</p>
<p>She looks so comfortable in that photo!  How&#8217;s Hellhound Snr. taking to her?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sunday 29th April, 2012 by Journeymouse</title>
		<link>http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1178#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>Journeymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1178#comment-862</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the &quot;pink&quot; bit that currently upsets me more. *sigh* I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll get used to it. Or make sure she chews up the collar and lead at some point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the &#8220;pink&#8221; bit that currently upsets me more. *sigh* I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll get used to it. Or make sure she chews up the collar and lead at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sunday 29th April, 2012 by Dylan Fox</title>
		<link>http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1178#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1178#comment-858</guid>
		<description>A Hellhound Princess?  That doesn&#039;t sound good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Hellhound Princess?  That doesn&#8217;t sound good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Women&#8217;s Role Models: An Introduction by DylanFox.net</title>
		<link>http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1048#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator>DylanFox.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 09:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1048#comment-852</guid>
		<description>[...] Europe&#8211;and so most likely your reconstruction of it&#8211;are entirely inaccurate; c) I want female characters, not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Europe&#8211;and so most likely your reconstruction of it&#8211;are entirely inaccurate; c) I want female characters, not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s Talk About Sex by Journeymouse</title>
		<link>http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1140#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Journeymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1140#comment-825</guid>
		<description>If I get into individuals taking responsibility, I start frothing at the mouth and making very anti-men remarks about &quot;they&quot; (i.e. the worst individuals) obviously can&#039;t control themselves and shouldn&#039;t be allowed out. The downside of having been on the wrong end of sexual manipulations and abuses without understanding how the other person thinks - and being unable to recognise I&#039;m being a hypocrite while doing so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I get into individuals taking responsibility, I start frothing at the mouth and making very anti-men remarks about &#8220;they&#8221; (i.e. the worst individuals) obviously can&#8217;t control themselves and shouldn&#8217;t be allowed out. The downside of having been on the wrong end of sexual manipulations and abuses without understanding how the other person thinks &#8211; and being unable to recognise I&#8217;m being a hypocrite while doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s Talk About Sex by Dylan Fox</title>
		<link>http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1140#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 06:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1140#comment-824</guid>
		<description>I got a kind of different message from the original Cracked article, and I think I&#039;ve finally figured out why.

See, I&#039;m sympathetic to the main thrust of the article--that men&#039;s attitudes towards women are dictated, in a large part, by social and some biological factors.  I think it&#039;s true--we are trained to see women as less-than-human, a kind of propety we can own and are entitled to.  It&#039;s also true that, no matter what your brain wants, we can&#039;t help who makes us horny and when.

What I think you&#039;re feeling the lack of, and I subconsciously put in myself, is a sense of individual responsibility.  I mean sure, all that stuff is true but the ultimate responsibility for our actions lies with us.  No one else.  

Your point about the article excusing and dismissing men&#039;s desire to dominate women is true and well-made.  However, the impression I took away was, &#039;now you know what you&#039;re fighting against, you&#039;ve got a better chance of winning&#039;.  I guess that&#039;s my privilege.  I&#039;m the gender being pandered to, not the one who&#039;s having their dehumanisation excused and justified.

So, thank you for checking my privilege!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a kind of different message from the original Cracked article, and I think I&#8217;ve finally figured out why.</p>
<p>See, I&#8217;m sympathetic to the main thrust of the article&#8211;that men&#8217;s attitudes towards women are dictated, in a large part, by social and some biological factors.  I think it&#8217;s true&#8211;we are trained to see women as less-than-human, a kind of propety we can own and are entitled to.  It&#8217;s also true that, no matter what your brain wants, we can&#8217;t help who makes us horny and when.</p>
<p>What I think you&#8217;re feeling the lack of, and I subconsciously put in myself, is a sense of individual responsibility.  I mean sure, all that stuff is true but the ultimate responsibility for our actions lies with us.  No one else.  </p>
<p>Your point about the article excusing and dismissing men&#8217;s desire to dominate women is true and well-made.  However, the impression I took away was, &#8216;now you know what you&#8217;re fighting against, you&#8217;ve got a better chance of winning&#8217;.  I guess that&#8217;s my privilege.  I&#8217;m the gender being pandered to, not the one who&#8217;s having their dehumanisation excused and justified.</p>
<p>So, thank you for checking my privilege!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Women&#8217;s Role Models: Politicians by Dylan Fox</title>
		<link>http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1124#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1124#comment-604</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s not even as much as people being more comfortable with absolutes.  I mean, what you&#039;ve put together is a set of proto-types defined by the roles they fulfil.  People like me--who like systems and rules and neat little boxes we can label and move around--can use them to create a character that&#039;s going to fufil a particular function, and then have a kind of secondary set of characterstics for the character.  Like the General who uses &#039;female wiles&#039;, or the Ringer who uses the force of arms/personality etc to become a General.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s not even as much as people being more comfortable with absolutes.  I mean, what you&#8217;ve put together is a set of proto-types defined by the roles they fulfil.  People like me&#8211;who like systems and rules and neat little boxes we can label and move around&#8211;can use them to create a character that&#8217;s going to fufil a particular function, and then have a kind of secondary set of characterstics for the character.  Like the General who uses &#8216;female wiles&#8217;, or the Ringer who uses the force of arms/personality etc to become a General.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Women&#8217;s Role Models: Politicians by Journeymouse</title>
		<link>http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1124#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Journeymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journeymouse.net/wp/?p=1124#comment-601</guid>
		<description>The irony being that Lady MacBeth (as a parallel to her husband&#039;s personality assassination) probably wasn&#039;t the worst woman to get some power in Scotland.

Oh, and Star Wars counts :)

Anyway, agreed on the overlaps. I think it depends in which category one starts. Like with the well-received artists who were Politicians first, or nuns (Soldiers) who became social leaders (Generals) with plenty of &quot;I am but a weak woman&quot; rhetoric are making use of Politician&#039;s skills. As with everything else in life, there are very few absolutes but people find it easier to deal in them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The irony being that Lady MacBeth (as a parallel to her husband&#8217;s personality assassination) probably wasn&#8217;t the worst woman to get some power in Scotland.</p>
<p>Oh, and Star Wars counts <img src='http://journeymouse.net/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyway, agreed on the overlaps. I think it depends in which category one starts. Like with the well-received artists who were Politicians first, or nuns (Soldiers) who became social leaders (Generals) with plenty of &#8220;I am but a weak woman&#8221; rhetoric are making use of Politician&#8217;s skills. As with everything else in life, there are very few absolutes but people find it easier to deal in them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

